Suicyclists
The proposed law where the car driver is always at fault when a cyclist is involved seems an absolute nightmare. A friend of mine killed a cyclist but was exonerated because it was found that the young boy was going hell for leather down a hill on a side road and, without stopping, tried to cross a trunk road. Under the proposed law would my friend have been facing jail?
Asked on 19 December 2009 by
Answered by
Honest John
It's a completely loony proposal from the Department of Fanatical Twerps, the unforeseen consequence of which is that any cyclist, anywhere, at any time could deliberately cause a crash with a car for which, under the new law, the car driver would automatically be blamed. However, they do have a similar practice in Thailand where if, for example, a drunken moped driver causes a crash that results in his injury or death, the driver of the larger vehicle is held accountable and may have to pay £1,000 or so to the bereaved family. In Thailand this liability has been kept in proportion, but in the UK it could go bonkers with £1,000,000 plus being claimed from the unfortunate car/van/truck driver, bringing about yet another increase in insurance premiums and criminalising yet more of the population.
Similar questions
Where a car knocks into a bicycle on a public road is there a presumption of guilt against the motorist. My friend, who was cycling with a number of others from a bicycle club, pulled up at a crossroads...
I was going through a mini roundabout at about 10pm when a cyclist banged into my driver's side door. I stopped and got out to see what happened and saw a cyclist with no light. I asked if he was alright...
The Freight Transport Association recently stated: “We need to see cyclists taking responsibility for their actions, obeying traffic regulations, giving space to HGVs making manoeuvres and generally riding...

