Cyclists at traffic lights

As a keen cyclist and also driver, I completely disagree with MW of Chatham, who says that cyclists should stay at the back of the queue at traffic lights. I never drive into the centre of town as I hate causing congestion and pollution in my car by sitting stationary at the lights. Cyclists cause no congestion or pollution and have to make more effort than car drivers.

Why should they stay behind all those vehicles, breathing in stinking exhaust fumes?

The other main reason for advanced stop areas for cyclists is that many cyclists are killed by drivers, especially lorries, turning left at junctions. As a cyclist I find junctions that don't have the advanced stop area very dangerous, and I certainly don't wait at the left of any vehicle - I move to the front of the queue, for my own safety.

Asked on 27 December 2011 by Fiona Le Ny

Answered by Honest John
I don't see why people who pay nothing for using the roads and pay no fuel tax and make no contribution to the economy should be allowed to hold up those who pay for the roads and earn the money we all live on.
Tags: cyclists
Similar questions
Where a car knocks into a bicycle on a public road is there a presumption of guilt against the motorist. My friend, who was cycling with a number of others from a bicycle club, pulled up at a crossroads...
Consider a pedal cyclist riding along an unlit road at night, with no lights. If I just do not see him and then hit him, where do I stand legally and for insurance?
I have received a summons under the careless driving umbrella, specifically saying I passed a cyclist too close (which I dispute). This came about by the cyclist uploading his cycle cam video to the police...
 

Ask Honest John

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 10% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ10 to save on an ALA policy

See offer