Is it credible that the new Mercedes-Benz CKS 350 petrol returns 40mpg?
I was surprised by the fuel consumption claim of 40mpg combined for the new Mercedes-Benz CLS 350 petrol model. I think the old model 320CDI was 36mpg combined (37.2mpg on 245 rear tyres). I have a 5-year-old 350 petrol, which had a combined claim of 29mpg that is only achievable on long motorway runs. I am aware that much work has been done to improve the economy of petrol engines but is this credible?
Asked on 5 March 2011 by PJ, Wendover
Answered by
Honest John
No. All it means is that they stuck it on a chassis dynamometer that replicated the EC driving cycle and managed to achieve the equivalent of 40mpg in the EC combined cycle. Whether a real person can really achieve that in real life is another matter entirely. That said, over 692.3 miles in a Jaguar XJL 3.0V6 diesel I recently averaged 41mpg at an average speed of 58mph, and that is better than the official combined figure of 39.2mpg. For a better idea of the true fuel economy of recent cars, consult and participate in the Real Life Fuel Economy Register at: www.honestjohn.co.uk/realmpg
Tags:
fuel economy
real mpg
Similar questions
My Ford Mondeo the dashboard info tells me my average mpg is 57.2 - way above what I see on Real MPG. Could this be a true figure or computer error?
My Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost is not doing the miles per gallon it should. I'm only getting 40mpg to 45mpg. Why is this?
I'm looking for a new company car and l'm interested in hybrid vehicles due to the lower BiK rates in comparison with diesels. I will be doing regular 100-mile journeys, so need to factor in real world...
Related models
A characterful alternative to the go-to German luxury saloons and far more engaging to drive. Diesel offers low emissions and tax but is very strong. Excellent overall refinement.
Big CO2 reductions. Four-cylinder CLS 250 CDI available at last. Precisely-built interior. Retains unique style of original CLS. Comes with full LED headlights.

