EC tests and fuel economy
I'm intrigued about real world economy and the rise of the so called eco models which do not seem to come close to their claimed figures. My five year old 1.9 Diesel Skoda Roomster regularly returns 53mpg in combined motoring conditions, brim to brim calculated. Long motorway runs encourage 61 to 62mpg brim to brim calculated. This from a 105bhp old fashioned car. Has any real progress been made by the industry on economy or are we just paying for "add-ons" to lower emissions and taxation?
Asked on 18 September 2011 by RF, via email
Answered by
Honest John
Basically the manufacturers have found ways to beat the system of EC tests that actually bear little relation to real life, but the test figures are the only figures they are legally allowed to publish. If you want the truth, go to www.honestjohn.co.uk/realmpg
Tags:
fuel economy
Real MPG enables you to register the fuel economy you are actually getting against your make and model of car, its engine and type of transmission.
Every time you enter an average consumption figure against your car, the overall average automatically adjusts to reflect it.
Similar questions
We have a 2014 Land Rover Freelander (15,000 miles) and a 2013 Kia Rio (22,000) on 17-inch rims (big mistake for country roads). We have a budget of about £20,000 and would like to change the Kia Rio for...
I live in the depth of the countryside and now have to travel 65-miles (round trip) to work on a variety of roads. I'm currently driving a 1.2 petrol SEAT Ibiza (2010 model) which is eating through fuel...
My Ford Mondeo the dashboard info tells me my average mpg is 57.2 - way above what I see on Real MPG. Could this be a true figure or computer error?
Elsewhere on 
