Action taken for no VED or SORN?
In your experience, what action is likely to be taken by the DVLA and/or Police against an owner who keeps their vehicle off the public road for almost a year without valid VED or SORN but continuously insures it? I have heard that if a vehicle so kept is not causing a nuisance the owner is unlikely to be pursued for any fines etc.
Asked on 16 February 2013 by William Jackson
Answered by
Honest John
They are hotter on continuous insurance than they are on SORN for a car not used on the road. But silly not to to SORN it because once SORNed it does not have to be continuously insured.
We give you the low down on how to save on insurance, little-known tricks and tips, what insurance groups mean and how to use insurance aggregators to beat insurers.
Insurance group finder and how to save on insuranceSimilar questions
I'm thinking of getting a moped for my 16-year-old son, putting the insurance in his name so he gets a year's no claims towards his car insurance at 17. Would this work?
My car was declared a Category N write-off following an incident for which the other party admitted full liability. I disputed a first phoned offer from his insurer and immediately emailed them with six...
My 981 Porsche Boxster was stolen and recovered the same day (15 August 2017). I'm still waiting to get it back from the insurance company. The ECU was cut out and the car was generally thrashed. Talking...
Elsewhere on 
