Ford C-Max - Should I get an EcoBoost?
I'm looking at replacing my Ford C-Max with the newer version. My mileage is around 10,000 a year and I’m not looking for high performance - reliability is more important. My choices are between the 1.0 EcoBoost and standard 1.6. Which would you recommend?
Asked on 10 October 2013 by Grandad2
Answered by
Honest John
We're seeing slightly worse real life mpg from the 1.0 EcoBoost than from the 1.6: www.honestjohn.co.uk/realmpg/ford/c-max-2010 Of course the annual VED is less for the 1.0 EcoBoost and it's more enjoyable to drive.
Tags:
fuel economy
buying a new car
Real MPG enables you to register the fuel economy you are actually getting against your make and model of car, its engine and type of transmission.
Every time you enter an average consumption figure against your car, the overall average automatically adjusts to reflect it.
Similar questions
The 1.0-litre 'Ecoboost' petrol engine in the Ford C-MAX is amazingly swift and responsive, can such an arrangement really deliver long-term on A-roads and motorways?
I have never owned a turbo-boosted...
We currently run a 2003 Ford Focus TDI which we have been reasonably happy with, some comfort issues apart. It has 108,000 miles on the clock and a few dents and scratches which we have not had fixed....
I live in the depth of the countryside and now have to travel 65-miles (round trip) to work on a variety of roads. I'm currently driving a 1.2 petrol SEAT Ibiza (2010 model) which is eating through fuel...
Related models
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Neat styling. More practical than a Focus. Fine blend of ride comfort, handling and driver enjoyment. 1.6 TDCi emits 119g/km. High quality interior.
Elsewhere on 
