Why are whiplash claims paid out to drivers of cars with head restraints?
Insurance claims for whiplash injuries have been in the news yet again. Maybe I am naive, but I thought the reason why all cars are now fitted with head restraints was to prevent such accidents. We were certainly told that at the time by the authorities. Bearing that in mind, I suggest that insurance companies take a much tougher line with these claimants, and refuse to pay out in cases where restraints are fitted. Where they are not, such as in older cars, there may be a case, but each one should be assessed on its merits and a very comprehensive medical report should be obtained. I'm afraid the companies only have themselves to blame for the astronomical rise in whiplash claims, but unfortunately we all suffer as a result.
Asked on 23 February 2013 by ME, via email
Answered by
Honest John
One fraudulent whiplash claimant was recently 'awarded' nine months inside by a small claims court judge.
We give you the low down on how to save on insurance, little-known tricks and tips, what insurance groups mean and how to use insurance aggregators to beat insurers.
Insurance group finder and how to save on insuranceSimilar questions
I bumped another car whilst parking. No damage was done and neither party claimed but I lost four years of No Claims Dicsount. Is this fair?
Last December, my son's neighbour reversed into my car, which was parked across the road from him. My car was repaired by the neighbour's insurer after he admitted full responsibility, and I approached...
I was involved in a car accident last year and the other party admitted liability. His insurance company rang and confirmed liability both to me and my insurers. My insurance duly paid for all the repairs...
Elsewhere on 
