Are diesel engines really that bad?
Geoffrey Lean in the Telegraph blames diesel cars for pollution, forgetting that almost ALL commercial transport, on sea and land, runs on oil fuel. Modern diesels do not smoke and with the filters and catalysts they are pretty clean engines. What is the truth? Are diesels really as bad as all that, and how do they really compare with petrol engines for emissions?
Asked on 15 March 2015 by Andy Taylor
Answered by
Honest John
There is no alternative for heavy transport and truck diesels. They are now fitted with diesel particulate filters and Nox traps that routinely have to be cleaned or replaced every 80,000 miles or so. Some heavy trucks have been converted to CNG in the Far East, but this involves carrying a virtual bomb rack of CNG containers. However, there is no need for cars to have diesel engines and over a seven year life of a new car an EU6 diesel engine will require so many expensive component replacements that its total running costs will usually exceed those of a petrol engined car driven over the same period.
Tags:
diesel engines
Similar questions
I currently run a 2006 Honda Accord 2.2 i-CTDi and have been using Shell V-Power diesel fuel exclusively. I was just wondering what your thoughts are and why you singled out BP Ultimate diesel as your...
I do about 12,000 miles a year, mostly short runs with occasional motorway long hauls. I know most (if not all) modern diesels have DPFs which can give problems. But I like diesels because of the relaxed...
I have a Skoda Yeti 1.9 TDI I bought six months ago. In those six months the diesel particulate filter light has come on on three occasions - it is true that I don't do many miles and drive it like a diesel,...

