Ad Free Backroom - Adam {P}
HJ's idea sounds like a good one. I have started this thread for 2 reasons

1) Someone was going to have to anyway

2) A question

How many Back Room Members are there out of interest? HJ suggested 60 quid from 1000 members. Are there 1000?

Thanks

Adam
--
"Ah...beer - my only weakness - my achilles heel if you will"
Ad Free Backroom - smokie
I moderate on another board. We have 726 registered members, but only about 20-30 are what I would call "regulars". However we designed and printed a club t shirt for this year's event and sold around 200, at cost price.

It's hard to tell how many members would pay £60 just for membership though. To be honest, despite the pleasure I get from the BackRoom, I'm not sure I would...maybe a tenner, maybe.
Ad Free Backroom - Adam {P}
I would pay as I consider myself a 'regular' but my problem is that not only have finished uni until September, I've left my job as well! Bad timing I know....

People may consider the ads to be not much of a nuisance to warrent paying £60 but the idea is certainly well worth considering.

Adam
--
"Ah...beer - my only weakness - my achilles heel if you will"
Ad Free Backroom - Adam {P}
Above is a good example of what happens when you rush a post.

Obviously the first line should read "...not only have I finished uni" but also "warrent" to "warrant".

It's being picky I know but I can do that to my own posts!

Thanks

Adam
--
"Ah...beer - my only weakness - my achilles heel if you will"
Ad Free Backroom - PoloGirl
£60,000 a year to run this site? Pull the other one... or get a different hosting company!

HJ I think you're onto a loser with this one. Not only are there not 1000 people who contribute/read regularly enough to warrant paying £60 to do so, but I don't think anyone would cough up that much money in one hit...maybe £5 a month, but not all in one go. It's also way above the market rate for other sites that offer paid for ad-free content.

Ad Free Backroom - Nsar
I'm OK with the ads (I click on quite a few with genuine interest) apart from the poorly designed pop-ups but I see that as being primarily a design issue that can be controlled before they are put onto the site - to the benefit of both user and advertiser, rather than a question of whether pop-ups should be here or not - they are and that's that.
So in conclusion I won't be stumping up £60+VAT, nor will I be bleating about ads.
Ad Free Backroom - No Do$h
I agree with you Nsar. I too click on some of the ads but the pop-up and some of the flash ones make me scream. I won't click on them as a point of principle.
Ad Free Backroom - Cliff Pope
I agree with Nsar - keep the ads, I don't mind them.

Another point is that once you charge £60, or indeed anything, for membership, you limit the available pool of knowledge or otherwise interesting contributions to the members. One of the things I like about this forum is that anybody can come here, by chance or by personal recomendation, and get expert answers to a specific question. That person may or may not stay as a more or less regular browser or contributor, but the forum has been enriched by his/her presence.

I think a little bit of fine tuning on some of the pop-ups is all that is needed. If the ads pay for the forum, keep it that way.
Ad Free Backroom - harry m
i agree totally with nsar,no dosh and cliff pope.
Ad Free Backroom - Drivethru
I also agree with the above, especially cliff pope's comments. I wouldn't pay £60 for the sake of getting rid of the ad's.
Ad Free Backroom - frostbite
I was quite horrified to see HJ's claim of what this site is costing him (not the 60k bit).

I have often contrasted this site with www.karlsforums.com/forums which has been run by an individual for some years and has only very recently started taking ads.

The site was started by Karl (forget his surname) when Tiscali committed some slur against him and were subsequently forced to apologise on all their forums, where he had been a regular poster in the PC Help section.

The point is, I don't think he is wealthy and, although he has always tried to be very helpful to others, I doubt he is in a position to spend a fortune purely for the benefit of others.

I am not connected with him - in fact I stopped posting on his site when he deleted my link to this site (in his 'useful links' section) "because it is a commercial site" and I went all huffy.
Ad Free Backroom - Altea Ego
For 60 quid i will suffer the adds
Ad Free Backroom - Altea Ego
However I would buy a nicely designed 20 quid HJ backroomers t shirt every year!
Ad Free Backroom - harry m
yes i think i could manage one of those.
Ad Free Backroom - Mark (RLBS)
I don't think anyone, and certainly not me, is bothered by the normal adverts. In fact, I quite often click on them - especially the ones offering deals of one sort or another.

The pop-ups are a different matter. You can get deluged by them, they're intrusive, and frequently cause technical issues. Hell will freeze over before I click on one of those.

But £60 ?? Not from me. And I don't think you would find 1,000 people to give you that, either.

However, can I assume that since you need £60k to remove the ads, then that is how much revenue you are currently getting from them ? If so, that was a pretty impressive deal.
Ad Free Backroom - Adam {P}
I agree with everyone above. The adverts are...ok - the only problems I've had is I.E. crashing but that's my own fault for using it! I've only ever really clicked on the Volvo I.Q. Test Ad (due to the publicity it got on some posts) and the Autotrader ads but that's about it. For £60 I could live with them.
--
"Ah...beer - my only weakness - my achilles heel if you will"
Ad Free Backroom - drbe
Agreed.

The pop-ups are annoying (were annoying until I downloaded the Google toolbar) but for sixty quid I'll put up with the ones that get through.

I won't even pay £5 a year to friends re-united.

Don drbe
Ad Free Backroom - Martin Devon
Agreed.
The pop-ups are annoying (were annoying until I downloaded the Google
toolbar) but for sixty quid I'll put up with the ones
that get through.
I won't even pay £5 a year to friends re-united.
Don drbe

If you won't pay £5.00. a year to friends re-united you must be some kind of sad person. (Person), was not the word that I wanted to use.
Ad Free Backroom - Altea Ego
I wont pay 5 quid to be in touch with people I was happy to see the back of 32 years ago either.
Ad Free Backroom - Martin Devon
I wont pay 5 quid to be in touch with people
I was happy to see the back of 32 years ago
either.

Dear Renault family,

Did you dislike ALL of the people you were at school with??

Regards.
Ad Free Backroom - Altea Ego
It was a joke! I have fond memories (specially the girls), but still wont shell out 5 quid, we have 32 years of nothing in common.
Ad Free Backroom - volvoman
In my limited experience there seem to be 2 main groups of people drawn to such 'reunion' sites Those who've done well and want to tell everyone and those whose life has come up well short for one reason or another and who are trying to rekindle their youth. Amongst former friends of mine there are several whose marriages have fallen apart as a result of doing just this with quite a few who seem to be heading the same way.

I'll stick with HJ and my virtual chums in the BackRoom thanks :)
Ad Free Backroom - Honestjohn
The Backroom has so far responded exactly as I thought it would. But to answer Mark, and out of respect for Mark, the £60k was not the expected clear income. It\'s a figure I had to set to clear maybe £10k to £15k after costs, debt funding and everything else. But Mark knows that. This website has to generate a lot of money to pay back a lot of debt for the years when it earned nothing.

HJ
Ad Free Backroom - Altea Ego
"But to answer Mark, and out of respect for Mark,"

Oh dear, this sounds like "the manager has the full confidence of the chariman and board"
Ad Free Backroom - SteveH42
£60,000 a year to run this site? Pull the other one...
or get a different hosting company!


Quite aside from the debt already mentioned, I suspect it would become harder to expect the mods to do their job for practically no reward on a subscription-based service...

One thing I do wonder though is how much the ads bring in per regular used over the space of a year - i.e., how much we would have to pay to be better off without them. If HJ gets say a tenner a user a year then offering the option to pay £15 without ads (while still having the 'free' site with ads) would still surely make him better off?

Of course, the other thing to consider is that a subscription might just end in the majority going elsewhere. (As happened with L@L and other sites that tried to introduce charges)
Ad Free Backroom - Honestjohn
In answer to SteveH42 and others, all of you seem to forget the set-up costs, which are enormous. I can't do it myself. I have to pay people to do it for me. And everything has to fit. So before I made any big change like this I would want the money to do it with in the bank.

HJ
Ad Free Backroom - SteveH42
So am I misunderstanding this? Are you saying that the subscription is not to fund the site as it stands, but to expand what the site offers at the moment - in effect, a redesign? Also, I suspect the 'scope' is being misunderstood - many users here only use the backroom rather than the rest of the site and see it as little more than a discussion board.

The backroom itself is very unlikely to support a pay-for service - as I commented, there are plenty of other free or very low cost 'chat' services available which would support an alternative. I can, however, see the scope in charging for the rest of the site. Maybe things like a brief road-test for free and the option to purchase a more detailed version? The main problem is that for everything other than the backroom, the site is not one that you'd use day in, day out.
Ad Free Backroom - No Do$h
Quite aside from the debt already mentioned, I suspect
it would become harder to expect the mods to do their
job for practically no reward on a subscription-based service...


Practically? There's no practically about it!

No Dosh
Backroom Moderator
mailto:moderators@honestjohn.co.uk
Ad Free Backroom - Dalglish
hj's "£60 a year commitmment (= £5 per month)" thread or challenge

www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?f=2&t=22...7

is designed to prove all the moaners and groaners wrong.

hj will easily prove that most backroomers are not going to pay a penny, let alone a £5 per month equivalent.

however, as with most others on this thread, i agree that it is the pop-ups and flash which are a nuisance. i can easily tolerate the banner ads, especially as i have disabled the animation on this site via my firewall settings.

the real issue is that hj seems to be paying for a uk based cost for a service which he could get hosted from anywhere in the world. afterall, it is the internet. how about getting your support and internet services from indonesia-bali or growler's paradise island?

Ad Free Backroom - Honestjohn
Thanks Dalglish. Got it in one. But, as posted earlier in the thread, the server costs are only part of it. The site has been up for four years, earning nothing until about 10 months ago. That has created a mountain of debt. There are some extremely good reasons for not getting support and internet services from Indonesia, however cheap they may superficially appear.

HJ
Ad Free Backroom - Civic8
I agree with nsar.no dosh and cliff pope.keep the adds they dont bother me anyway.I have actualy used a few for friends that come around.so I dont think a waste.and have had comments on what a good site it is.Thats why I use it
Ad Free Backroom - Quinny100
I cannot believe the Backroom alone costs £60k a year to run.

You can get a vBulletin licence (far superior forum software to whats used here) and a dedicated server with 1500Gb transfer allowance for about £150 a month from US providers.
Ad Free Backroom - carl_a
Where did anyone say that the back room costs £60k a year to run ?.
It doesn't cost much at all to have the forum software & hosting (I pay $40 a year for my hosting), but 60k might be what the adverts bring in, perhaps the adverts would have to be taken off the whole site not just the back room.

Honest John puts a lot of work into this site, think of the all the equipment (computer etc), internet connection, electricity bills and most importantly time spent.

signature free Backroom - Imagos
subscription site? If the backroom wants to self destruct then this is the way to do it. Keep the site and ads as they are. I wish people would stop whingeing about them, it's getting boring.

no it's the silly signatures on posts that get up my nose. ban them i say.


:oh women, my only weak spot my big toe if you wont:

signature free Backroom - No Do$h
no it's the silly signatures on posts that get up my
nose. ban them i say.
:oh women, my only weak spot my big toe if you
wont:


Er.... that was tongue in cheek, right?
signature free Backroom - Imagos
Er.... that was tongue in cheek, right?


of course..tongue firmly in cheek.. a bit of levity.
signature free Backroom - Adam {P}
That looks strikingly similar to my signatur....oh wait - that was the point.


As the great Homer Simpson said:


--
"Ah...beer - my only weakness - my achilles heel if you will"
Ad Free Backroom - THe Growler
The BR is very important to me so far away, and in particular my partner who pores over almost every post -- she says she learns so much about Britain -- and I would chip in in any reasonable way if requested or required to ensure its survival. It's always a slight source of astomishment to me that one can have access to such a vast information base, not to mention wit and wisdom, for free, without the flames and stupid nonsense so prevalent on other Boards.

As for the ads they don't bother me at all. There's a price for everything.
Ad Free Backroom - volvoman
Well I've been around here a couple of years now I guess and I couldn't care less about the ads. I don't suffer any technical problems due to pop-ups 'cos I don't get any. I do however sympathise with those contributors who have such problems. As others who've been around longer than me will know, this site has changed over time and mostly for the better. It's true that as it has become more popular the 'small family' feel it once had has inevitably been lost and many former regular contributors have faded away. Whilst a little sad, this is IMO (as Growler implied) a price worth paying. If I were HJ I'd want to get any technical problems sorted (as I'm sure he does) but I'd also get pretty hacked off having to justify the running of the site to those who whinge but won't put their money where their mouth is. Constructive input direct to HJ is welcome I'm sure, however we are all guests here and if we don't like it we can always do the other thing.

Have a nice day everyone.
Ad Free Backroom - Mark (RLBS)
To be serious abuot this for a moment....

There are a number of different costs associated with a website such as this; These range from the technical costs such as servers and bandwidth to people costs such as HJ, Stephen and ourselves.

Somehow this has to be paid for. If HJ every makes a billion out of this website, then I shall be clamouring for my share, but I think we can safely assume that there is very little chance of that happening. However, what would clearly not be acceptable is for HJ to subsidise this website out of his own pocket - and that has happened in the past.

And that's just cash, there is also the matter of time; Not so much for me, because this isn't my job. If you wanted your company managed, then I wuold expect to be paid, because that's what I do professionally - however moderatin a chat room is mostly a hobby (bit more complex than that, but that is pretty much the case). However, writing articles, reports, road tests, etc. etc. is actualy HJ's job and it is as a writer that he keeps the wolf from the door. I don't know what you would have to pay HJ per word if you wanted him to contribute to your website, but I am sure it would be a lot more than he gets on this site after you've taken out all the other costs from the advertising revenue.

My point being that it is not unreasonable that he should expect a profit, albeit small, from this website and he should be absolutely sure that it isn't actually going to cost him money.

I think we're all agreed that the website in general, and the Backroom certainly, are well worth having.

It is also free insofar as none of the contributors have to make a cash contribution. I tend to agree with the feeling that the reality is people would not pay, or if they did, they either wouldn't pay much or not enough of them would pay.

Therefore we're stuck with the adverts. And to be fair a lot of them are quite useful - especially the ones showing deals that are being offered.

I would doubt that anybody has an issue with the adverts existing or the amount of adverts we have.

What people object to, I think, are pop up adverts which either appear every 10 seconds, or the ones that when they do appear screw something up.

I presume that if every time you visited the site you saw each of the pop-ups once, and then they didn't appear until your next visit, then that would be acceptable. I also assume that if they didn't cause any technical difficulties then again there wouldn't be any serious objection to them.

If that is the case, then if we simply try and resolve the technical difficulties, then there really is no issue. Or am I wrong ??

I would pay to stop the pop-ups causing me trouble. The rest of the advertising environment is a matter of complete irrelevance to me. However, I wouldn't pay £60, and perhaps not even a tenner, to solve a problm that small.

"If you don't like it, then find somewhere else to be" is a phrase I have been known to use. However, when it is a matter as fundemental as the usage/usability of the site and it affects so many people, I think it would be rather more productive to get to the route of the issue and see if that can be resolved.

Mark.
Ad Free Backroom - Dalglish
hj and mark
you have my vote.
carry on as normal, just do the best to avoid technical probs with po-ups.
as i suspected, and as hj confirmed, his £60 per year post was a psychological ploy to show that no one here will sign up to pay a penny when asked for it.
hj has not said that it cost him 6o grand nor that the current income from the ads amounts to 60 grand.
the hidden message i see there is that he is saying that is the gross amount he needs to make a year to keep this site viable - for him to pay of the legacy of debts, to pay for the current running costs, and pay for the mods beer & sndwich now and again. after all that, it may leave him a few pennies "operating-profit" although i doubt you could call it that if he charged for his time to the company "honestjohn.co.uk".

apart from the whingers and free loaders, who can object to you resolving the root of the issue.

even google are going to intorduce banner-ads soon.
An alternative approach? - NowWheels
May I suggest that here two ways of looking at this issue?

The first approach is the one which HJ proposed: set a fee based on what he reckons he'd like to earn from the backroom. The problem is that it's clearly much more than folks are preapred to pay.

However, the alternative approach to the problem is to look at how much money the ads bring in, and whether subscriptions might bring in more. That might not be as much as HJ would like, but if it's enough to replace the ad revenue plus the cost of the establishing and running subscription system, he'd come out ahead.

Remember, the proposal was not to eliminate the ads entirely,merely to turn them off for the folks who pay the subs. So the relevant advertising income here is not the site's total ad revenue, but the ad revenue from 1,000 backroomers.

If the advertisers are prepared to pay anything near £60 per user per year for the privelige of pushing ads into the backroom, then I reckon he's onto a very good thing and should hang on to the money while it lasts. I don't claim to have much of a grasp of the economics of advertising, but I'd be very surprised if that was a wise use of an advertising budget ... so even if there is that much coming in, I really wonder if it would last.

It's HJ's site, and it's his call how he wants to run it. But it seems to me that a much lower-priced subscription model would probably still bring in more money than advertising
An alternative approach? - frostbite
I am intrigued by the 'legacy of debt' mentioned. Come to that I would be interested to see the history of this site.

Or is that impertinent?
An alternative approach? - Honestjohn
Many thanks, No Wheels. You have a lot of ideas. But as I mentioned earlier, before I make any major changes to the site I want the money to fund those changes up-front. I can't make the changes myself. I have no tecchie knowledge and don't have time anyway. I would have to employ people to do this. The orginal design and set-up costs of the site (paid by my publisher) were mind-boggling. At the moment I can't even afford to free-up the directories which a previous webmaster locked in html.

Also I have a contract with the ad agency. I cannot suddenly shift the goalposts by failing to deliver what the site currently offers to advertisers.

By the way, site visits have now reached an all time record of an average of 10,320 a day for May so far and suddenly the most read section has become the road tests, apparently from Google search engine referrals by make and model of car.

As for the £60k you think I make, where did you get that from? I explained earlier in the thread that to pull in a subscription income of £10k to £15k, after costs, I have to go for a subscription income of £60k.

But anyway, the point is proven, not a single Backroomer has committed to pay a £60 a year sub.

Dan's well-organinsed Backroom Meet in North London last summer is still a painful memory. It was discussed endlessly in The Backroom. Well over a hundred Backroomers promised to show up. But only ten did.

HJ
An alternative approach? - Imagos
By the way, site visits have now reached an all time
record of an average of 10,320 a day for May >>


would it be possible to know how many backroomers there are?

regulars, non regulars, general stats for site etc etc

(just curious)
An alternative approach? - Ford Dagenham
Hi

Heres my 10p worth.

I think a small online shop should be started whereby you can purchase :-

HJ/backroom keyrings.
Window stickers.
T shirts.
Mouse mats.

They will generate some income as people like to promote something they think is good.
--
(iam not a mechanic)

Martin Winters
An alternative approach? - smokie
We looked at a shop on the site I moderate, but there is quite considerable cost involved in setting up (stocking), and also for small items p&p can make them unappealing. When we did the t shirts, we did them to order, cash up front, and at cost. I wouldn't imagine it would be a money spinner here.
An alternative approach? - Altea Ego
Do it on ebay.
An alternative approach? - OldPeculiar
I know I'm coming in a bit late on this but here's my tuppence.

I don't have a problem with ads, I even click on a few (most often auto trader - I think some car insurance ads, maybe quick search type like the autotrader one would be well clicked as well) I wouldn't pay to get rid of the ads it's just not that much of an incentive there would have to be other services included in a subscription fee to make it seem worthwhile eg. email account, personal avatar on posts, maybe an edit button? I'd probably buy into merchandising but at low volumes it wouldn't make much. The other suggestion that hasn't be raisied yet is a regular email from HJ to all backroomers inculding a couple of his articles and a bunch of advertising. Would that raise some revenue?
An alternative approach? - Honestjohn
Thanks for that, Old Peculiar. It's an idea. But everything I do apart from the magazine and newspaper stuff appears on the site anyway. I had wondered about the road tests because of the amount of work compared to the return, but it seems that they are now attracting a lot of new visits to the site via Google so have been worthwhile in terms of figures. If May continues the way it has been so far then we'll be looking at 320,000 site visits, which is 60,000 up on April and 70,000 up on March.

HJ
An alternative approach? - Adam {P}
I agree with OP on this one. If there were some other incentives such as an email address and more forum options then I would buy into it. I understand this would be difficult to implement but I feel more people would pay for this added incentive.

Thanks

Adam
--
No Signature at Imagos' Request
An alternative approach? - David Horn
www.cafepress.com

No set up costs, but it is US. Never stopped me from buying from there in the past, though.
An alternative approach? - PoloGirl
Oh please...is nobody bored of this yet?

Right so we've established that practically everyone doesn't actually mind the ads, except for when they go wrong. This is technology, things go wrong. It's not HJ's fault and he does a better job than most of getting hold of the right people to sort it out. All of us have said we're not really willing to pay for an ad free site, so how about we all stop moaning about the ads and just point out gently to HJ or the mods via email when something is going wrong? This is a motoring forum chaps (and chapesses), but it's becoming increasingly like a computer forum every day.

HJ... you're very defeatist. Lots of people have suggested ways to you of saving money or making extra revenue from this site - I even offerred to do your PR a few months back! Every suggestion has been met with a "yes but" or "that wouldn't work" with apparently no investigation.

And as for the people who've been saying "poor HJ, he shouldn't have to finance the site out of his own pocket". Er, of course he should - it's his business! Nobody goes up to Richard Branson, Mr Tesco or Mrs Marks and Spencer and says "blimey, you're doing a wonderful job there, would you like some cash" and expects nothing in return do they? HJ keeps the profit so why shouldn't he bear the losses too, especially as he's rather reluctant to take on new ideas which could actually make him money?

Finally to agree with some of the other posters, I would fully support the move to a format similar to that used by V-Bulletin, which offers the email, PM etc and would probably pay to use it (but not £60 a year!).



An alternative approach? - No Do$h
[round of applause mode]
Speechless, absolutely speechless. Brava! Brava!
[/round of applause mode]
An alternative approach? - Singer-G
The other suggestion
that hasn't be raisied yet is a regular email from HJ
to all backroomers inculding a couple of his articles and a
bunch of advertising. Would that raise some revenue?


I get too many unsolicited e.mails as it is. I would only approve of this idea if it were possible to opt out of the email sevice.
An alternative approach? - malteser
I think the approach suggested by several contributors which advocates leaving the ads, but trying to address problems with particular offerings as and when they arise, is the best solution.
I would not feel able to pay to access the Back Room, interesting site that it is. I will not pay for the screen print version of the Daily Telegraph, even though that denies me the pleasure of the cryptic crossword. (UK papers are extortionately expensive in Spain, so I don't purchase the paper editions either!)
I don't generally pay for software(apart from my virus checker & firewall, and even there I will be going for the free ones when current subs expire), either as there are ways and means ......................!
As an aside, the ad which has been causing page loading delays today - on Opera, Mozilla and IE - is Autotrader. It seems that the ads are set to load first before page content and if an ad fails, the page won't display.
Roger in Spain
An alternative approach? - Phil G
As with Pologirl, I'll offer my services for free to migrate the BR to another system in order to cut the costs of running the BR. I think if it was running vBulletin/IPB it has the potential to be much more successful than it is now.

You can make money from people on forums - and yes through ads. I think the text stuff HJ has from motorprovider and their ilk work the best, rather than a flash as for an XC90.
An alternative approach? - Honestjohn
Many thanks for everyone\'s contributions.

Migrating to another server in the States would not be as cheap as many of you imagine because we have to have at least two servers: one as back-up. (Remember what happened to all the servers in the basement of the WTC.)

We also have a contract with our UK servers until March next year.

A word to Pologirl: the reson I don\'t take on the new ideas is because I know they will create a lot more work to no benefit. I was the one who turned this site into a business, no one else. (Everyone else who tried failed, so I just had to do it myself.) It does work as a business. The whole point of bringing up the idea of subscriptions (again) was to prove (again) that it just won\'t work. More than 100 Backroomers promised to show up at Dan\'s Backroom Meet last year. In fact, only 10 did. No offence to Backroomers in general but that did established a ratio of likelihood.

But, on a positive note, all this discussion helped Stephen to renegotiate our UK server fees down by 20%, so thank you for that.

I think we have now taken this as far as we can, so I\'m going to lock the thread and make more space on the front page for normal Backroom discussion.


HJ