Real MPG: Fiat Tipo (2016 on)
Comfortable and easy to drive, spacious, sturdily built, good value when compared to the competition.
Not the best engines in the class, tiny touchscreen system, less gadgets than the similar Nissan Pulsar, advanced safety tech is optional.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 1.0 | - | 48.7–51.4 mpg | - | -* | |
| 1.0 Tipo Cross | - | 48.7 mpg | - | -* | |
| 1.3 MultiJet | 76.3 mpg | - | 53.5 mpg | 70% | |
| 1.4 | 37.2–49.6 mpg | 39.8–41.5 mpg | 36.2 mpg | 89%* | |
| 1.4 T-Jet | 40.4–47.1 mpg | 36.7–39.2 mpg | 36.5 mpg | 96%* | |
| 1.6 Automatic | 44.8 mpg | - | 43.8 mpg | 98% | |
| 1.6 MultiJet | 64.2–76.3 mpg | 51.4 mpg | 53.1 mpg | 103%* | |
| 1.6 MultiJet DCT | 44.8–74.3 mpg | - | 46.8 mpg | 79% |
Read the Honest John review...
.jpg?width=310&height=175&rmode=crop)
Fiat Tipo (2016 on)
Comfortable and easy to drive, spacious, sturdily built, good value when compared to the competition.
Rivals
| Fiat Tipo (2016 on) | 45.1 | avg mpg |
| Skoda Fabia (2015 - 2021) | 48.8 | avg mpg |
| Mazda 2 (2015 on) | 53.0 | avg mpg |
| Volkswagen Polo (2017 on) | 48.0 | avg mpg |
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
