Real MPG: Mazda CX-5 (2012 - 2016)
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 2.0 | 47.1 mpg | - | 40.1 mpg | 85% | |
| 2.0 165 | 47.1 mpg | - | 40.5 mpg | 86% | |
| 2.2 D 150 | 54.3–61.4 mpg | - | 46.2 mpg | 80% | |
| 2.2 D 150 4WD | 54.3 mpg | - | 41.5 mpg | 76% | |
| 2.2 D 150 Automatic | 51.4–53.3 mpg | - | 40.2 mpg | 77% | |
| 2.2 D 150 Automatic 4WD | 51.4 mpg | - | 34.9 mpg | 68% | |
| 2.2 D 150 Automatic AWD | 51.4 mpg | - | 36.5 mpg | 71% | |
| 2.2 D 150 AWD | 54.3 mpg | - | 42.0 mpg | 77% | |
| 2.2 D 175 4WD | 54.3 mpg | - | 40.6 mpg | 75% | |
| 2.2 D 175 Automatic 4WD | 51.4 mpg | - | 39.2 mpg | 76% |
Read the Honest John review...
Mazda CX-5 (2012 - 2016)
Economical and efficient. Comfortable ride. Well equipped as standard. Practical and spacious yet compact.
Rivals
| Mazda CX-5 (2012 - 2016) | 42.2 | avg mpg |
| Toyota RAV4 (2013 - 2019) | 41.6 | avg mpg |
| Suzuki SX4 S-Cross (2013 - 2021) | 48.3 | avg mpg |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2011 - 2019) | 35.4 | avg mpg |
Submit your Real MPG
