Real MPG: Toyota C-HR (2016 on)
Outstanding ride, road holding and handling. A pleasure to drive. 1.2 petrol or 1.8 hybrid. Solid build quality. More power and performance from 184PS 2.0 C-HR from January 2020. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto now standard.
Rear headroom is tight for tall adults. High load deck. 1.8 Hybrid wasn't as fun to drive as the 1.2 manual. No diesel engines.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 1.2 Turbo | 47.0 mpg | - | 37.1 mpg | 79% | |
| 1.2T | 46.3–47.9 mpg | - | 37.4 mpg | 79% | |
| 1.2T Automatic | 47.9 mpg | - | 39.1 mpg | 82% | |
| 1.2T Automatic 4WD | 42.2–44.8 mpg | - | 29.5 mpg | 68% | |
| 1.8 Hybrid | 72.4–74.3 mpg | 57.6–58.9 mpg | 58.4 mpg | 100%* | |
| 2.0 Hybrid | - | 54.3 mpg | - | -* |
Read the Honest John review...
.jpg?width=310&height=175&rmode=crop)
Toyota C-HR (2016 on)
Outstanding ride, road holding and handling. A pleasure to drive. 1.2 petrol or 1.8 hybrid. Solid build quality. More power and performance from 184PS 2.0 C-HR from January 2020. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto now standard.
Rivals
| Toyota C-HR (2016 on) | 54.2 | avg mpg |
| Suzuki Ignis (2017 on) | 56.8 | avg mpg |
| Volkswagen Tiguan (2016 on) | 42.9 | avg mpg |
| Citroen C3 Aircross (2017 on) | 41.9 | avg mpg |
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
